Breaking News

We search the news so you don’t have to!

  • Mar
    4
    One in five U.S. homeowners with mortgages owe more to their lenders than their homes are worth, and the rate will increase as housing prices drop in states that have so far avoided the worst of the crisis

    One in five U.S. homeowners with mortgages owe more to their lenders than their homes are worth, and the rate will increase as housing prices drop in states that have so far avoided the worst of the crisis

    NEW YORK (Reuters) – One in five U.S. homeowners with mortgages owe more to their lenders than their properties are worth, and the rate will increase as housing values drop in states that have so far avoided the worst of the crisis, a new study shows.

    About 8.31 million properties had negative equity at the end of 2008, up 9 percent from 7.63 million at the end of September, according to the study, released Wednesday by First American CoreLogic. The percentage of “underwater” borrowers rose to 20 percent from 18 percent.  Another 2.16 million properties could go underwater if home prices fall another 5 percent, the study shows.

    First American said the value of residential properties fell to $19.1 trillion at year-end from $21.5 trillion a year earlier, with half the decline in California. Forty-three U.S. states and Washington, D.C., were included in the study.  While states such as California, Florida and Nevada were particularly stressed, the study showed worrying signs of deterioration in relatively healthy parts of the nation.

    “The economic slowdown is broadening,” said Sherrill Shaffer, a banking professor at the University of Wyoming at Laramie and a former Federal Reserve official. “As more people lose jobs, it will be more difficult to sustain the levels of pricing and home ownership, and that is a big factor driving down housing prices in more parts of the country.”

    Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Ohio remained the most stressed states, with 62 percent of underwater borrowers and just 41 percent of mortgages.

    Other areas, though, also face more stress. Connecticut, for example, saw a 25 percent increase in homes with negative equity, while Washington, D.C., had a 44 percent increase.

    “Even I continue to be surprised at the tentacles of this financial and economic debacle,” said Robert MacIntosh, chief economist at Eaton Vance Management in Boston. “More people are being laid off, resulting in reduced income and therefore less consumption. That leaves fewer people with money to buy homes, and the mentality is that people believe they should wait six months rather than buy now. Less demand means falling prices.”

    Roughly 68 percent of U.S. adults own their own homes, and about two-thirds of these have mortgages. Many economists expect the nation’s unemployment rate to rise above 9 percent before the recession ends, up from January’s 7.6 percent.

    CALIFORNIA, NEVADA UNDER STRESS

    California had 1.9 million borrowers with negative equity at year-end, more than any other state, followed by Florida’s 1.28 million. About three in 10 borrowers in both states were underwater.

    By other measures, Nevada was the most stressed, with 55 percent of owners having negative equity and borrowers on average owing 97 percent of what their homes are worth. About 28 percent owe more than 125 percent of their homes’ value.

    Michigan had 40 percent of its homeowners underwater, while Arizona had 32 percent.

    New York fared best, with just 4.7 percent of borrowers with negative equity and an average 48 percent loan-to-value ratio, though this could change as employment and bonuses slide in the financial services industry.

    According to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices, prices of U.S. single-family homes slumped 18.5 percent in December from a year earlier, the biggest drop in the 21-year history of the data.

    Many lenders are taking steps to keep borrowers out of foreclosure. The Obama administration has backed legislation that could broaden powers of bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages for troubled borrowers. Among major lenders, only Citigroup Inc has supported such a plan.

    MacIntosh expects housing prices to keep falling until “well into” 2010. “There is no magic bullet or magic arrow here,” he said. “It is a question of trying to come up with ideas and seeing what happens. It could take a long time.”

    First American CoreLogic is an affiliate of title insurance and real estate services company First American Corp.


    No Comments
  • Feb
    24
    Several indices confirm what homeowners know: It was 4 quarters of misery. But for buyers with stable jobs, plummeting prices and low interest rates have created a sweet spot.

    Several indices confirm what homeowners know: It was 4 quarters of misery. But for buyers with stable jobs, plummeting prices and low interest rates have created a sweet spot.

    A slew of indexes confirm what every homeowner knows: 2008 was 4 quarters of misery. But for would-be buyers with stable jobs, plummeting prices and low interest rates have created a sweet spot.

    Two home-price surveys released today showed a fourth quarter unmatched in its misery for homeowners:

    • The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s House Price Index showed American homes losing an average 3.4% of their market value in the fourth quarter, worse even than the third quarter’s record-setting 2% drop. The fourth-quarter losses were the worst in the 18-year history of the government’s price survey. In all of 2008, prices fell 8.2%; 9.6% when adjusted for inflation.
    • The S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index, also out Tuesday, reported prices dropping 18.2% for the year. It was the greatest loss recorded in the report’s 21-year history. Prices dropped in every one of the 20 cities studied.

    In a third report, out earlier this month, the National Association of Realtors showed the U.S. median house price falling to $180,000 — a 12% loss in 2008.

    The surveys differ in their results because each uses different information. The housing finance agency doesn’t include jumbo loans, for example, but surveys 292 cities rather than 20. All, however, show the same record-breaking declines in values.

    Some analysts had predicted an even worse performance for 2008, noted James B. Lockhart, the director of the agency. “We are hopeful the housing initiatives announced last week by President Obama will begin to provide much-needed stability to the housing markets,” he said in a prepared statement.

    The government’s index, considered the broadest, shows prices falling last year in 44 states and Washington, D.C. In eight states, they fell more than 10%. Losses were worst in the disastrous housing markets of California, Florida and Nevada. In Merced, Calif., prices fell 16.29% in the fourth quarter alone and nearly 50% in all of last year, the worst decline in the country. The other bottom 10 cities included:

    • Stockton, Calif. (down 40.2% in 2008)
    • Modesto, Calif. (-37.8%)
    • Vallejo-Fairfield, Calif. (-34.4%)
    • Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif. (-34.3%)
    • Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla. (-32.9%)
    • Naples-Marco Island, Fla. (-32.9%)
    • Las Vegas-Paradise, Nev. (-32.6%)
    • Salinas, Calif. (-32.2%)
    • Punta Gorda, Fla. (-29.7%)

    Prices actually rose in six states last quarter, however: North Dakota (1.9%), Wyoming (1.5%), Alaska (0.4%), Texas (0.3%), Hawaii (0.3%) and South Dakota (0.2%).

    Ah, but if you’re a buyer . . .

    In this rain of economic misery, it’s understandable if you missed the lone scrap of good news: Putting a roof over your head is growing more affordable by the day. “It’s the one thing that’s getting better,” says Daniel McCue, a research analyst at Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies.

    In fact, housing is likely to grow even more affordable, at least for those who have still have jobs and can take advantage of plummeting prices and low interest rates.

    The monthly payment on a $160,000, 30-year fixed-rate loan at today’s average rate of 5.34% is $892. A year ago, at 6.37%, that loan would have cost $997 a month. If, as at least one economist predicts, rates drop to 4.5% this summer, that same mortgage will cost just $810 a month.

    The spoiler is, you’ll need a job to profit from this opportunity. A stable job. With the economy shedding a half-million or more jobs a month, that leaves out plenty of people. You also may need a loan, not a simplest thing while lenders are being extremely cautious.

    “There’s just not a lot of action at all,” says McCue. “The market has frozen up due to a lot of uncertainty.”

    You can see the banks’ point: With home prices still dropping, lenders can’t pin down a home’s value with any certainty. With sliding home prices, their collateral could end up worth less than the loan.

    “Even a healthy bank would be much more cautious in this environment, and it is unrealistic to expect battered, rescued institutions to behave very differently,” economist Ian Shepherdson wrote in his High Frequency Economics newsletter recently.

    Who’s best positioned to profit

    As if those weren’t enough obstacles, here’s another: Even if you’ve got a down payment saved, do you dare spend it? “Are you willing to use your savings for a down payment when you could need it for living if you take a hit on your income?” McCue asks.

    Who’s left to capitalize on this window of affordability? “People who were lucky enough not to lose a lot of equity in their homes or had been unable to participate or were priced out from the get-go,” says McCue. For them, “this is a chance to potentially have some more stable, more affordable housing.”

    Those best positioned to enjoy the discount:

    • Buyers who have good credit, stable employment and a down payment saved, including younger, first-time buyers who have been waiting for prices to drop so they can get into the housing market.
    • Sellers who still have plenty of equity in their homes, so they can afford to drop their selling price and use their equity to trade up to a better house.
    • Homeowners who can afford to wait out the bad years and feel no pressure to turn a profit anytime soon.

    Renters get a boost, too

    Already, falling prices spell opportunity for renters with stable incomes. Apartment rental prices fell in the third quarter of 2008 in nearly all of the 31 metro areas tracked by RealFacts, a Novato, Calif., company that analyzes apartment rent data. The biggest reductions: Miami‐Fort Lauderdale, Fla. (down 2.4%); Riverside‐San Bernardino, Calif. (down 2.4%); San Jose, Calif. (down 2.0%); and Oxnard‐Thousand Oaks‐Ventura, Calif. (down 1.8%). Other areas with substantial rent declines: Los Angeles, Orlando, Fla., and Phoenix.

    Nationally, the average rent dropped to $993 from a high of $1,002 in September 2007. Foreclosures and other financial pressures are keeping some people from launching households. Others are bunching up to save costs.

    “Some people who’ve gone out on their own have gone back home, or they’re going back to sharing an apartment with somebody,” says Caroline Latham, the CEO of RealFacts.

    For renters, what this means is, if you shop around in your city, you can lower your housing costs by moving or by using price comparisons to negotiate a drop in rent with your current landlord.

    Affordable? Or ominous?

    Housing will remain affordable, at least for those in the right position, as long as prices and interest rates stay low. If government stimulus efforts work — and there’s no guarantee they will — house prices should start rising slowly in mid-2010, hitting levels in 2013 last seen in late 2003, according to Economy.com. Mark Zandi, the company’s chief economist, predicts prices will probably get back to their 2006 peak 11 years from now.

    He’ll watch for these signs that the stimulus has begun to work: consumer confidence rising by early this summer and job losses dropping from their current rate of a half-million a month.

    Here are the reasons for Zandi’s guarded optimism:

    • While enormous numbers of foreclosed houses will remain on the market for years to come, the “inventory” of these distressed properties seems to be stabilizing, not growing.
    • Mortgage rates are low and could fall. Zandi predicts they’re about to dive again, with government monetary programs pushing rates as low as 4.5%, causing a refinance boom in the second quarter this year.

    Read another way, the tea leaves show diminishing chances that the turnaround will begin soon. When rents and home prices fall simultaneously in the same market, that’s a sign of continuing declines, warns economist Danilo Pelletiere, the research director for the National Low Income Housing Coalition. Rents are a kind of weather vane, Pelletiere says, pointing which way a local economy is headed. Stable or rising rents provide a floor for house prices, enabling investors to jump in.

    “Declining rents and declining home prices is a sign of a market in trouble,” Pelletiere says. Right now, that’s the case in most major cities in the U.S. “That’s not a situation you want to buy into, assuming you are buying for investment purposes and not because you’re buying into a house you love,” he says.

    Bottom line: If you buy at this point, be prepared for the home’s value to continue falling for a while. Even if the worst is over soon, Zandi’s prediction of prices reaching 2003 levels again in 2013 is a forecast for values nationally and on average. That means some cities could see price growth sooner and others could lag badly, depending on when the housing bust hit town, how hard it hit and the strength of the local economy.


    No Comments
  • Feb
    21

    Press secretary says TV reporter ‘doesn’t know what he’s talking about’

    gibbsWASHINGTON – The White House on Friday dismissed a cable television reporter’s criticism of President Barack Obama’s housing bailout plan as the ranting of an individual who “doesn’t know what he’s talking about.”

    In a report on CNBC on Thursday, Rick Santelli animatedly accused the Obama administration of “promoting bad behavior” with its $75 billion lifeline to millions of Americans on the brink of foreclosure. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs poked fun at Santelli by inviting him to come to the White House to read the details of Obama’s plan. “I’d be happy to buy him a cup of coffee,” Gibbs said. In a nod to Santelli’s caffeinated style, Gibbs then wryly added: “Decaf.”

    Santelli took the critique in stride, saying Gibbs had hardly offered tough words.

    “I think this is terrific that this has been opened up to national debate,” Santelli said in an MSNBC interview shortly after Gibbs’ daily briefing wrapped up. “I think it’s wonderful he invited to me to the White House. I’m really not big on decaf, though. I think I’d prefer tea.”

    The episode underscores how closely the Obama White House, like others before it, monitors how media coverage may be shaping public opinion. In particular, the constant chatter of cable television news shows has at times gotten under the skin of White House aides, and they have made no effort to hide their displeasure.

    The goal of Obama’s plan is to help millions of homeowners from being evicted and stabilize the flailing housing market. It aims to help struggling homeowners refinance and provides more money to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to encourage them to rework deeply troubled loans.

    Internet sensation
    In his report on CNBC, Santelli said responsible homeowners would end up subsidizing other people’s bad behavior.

    From the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade, he turned to traders and said: “How many of you people want to pay for your neighbor’s mortgage that has an extra bathroom and can’t pay their bills?” The traders booed that notion, and Santelli said: “President Obama, are you listening?” Santelli’s report has become something of an Internet sensation. Gibbs countered that Obama’s housing plan would help those who have acted responsibly but yet could lose their home.

    “Here’s what this plan won’t do,” Gibbs said. “It won’t help somebody trying to flip a house. It won’t bail out an investor looking to make a quick buck. It won’t help speculators that were betting on a risky market. And it is not going to help a lender who knowingly made a bad loan.”

    Later, Gibbs acknowledged that “there will be people that made bad decisions that in some ways will get help,” but that they are not the focus. “I also think it’s tremendously important that for people who rant on cable television to be responsible and understand what it is they’re talking about,” he said.

    1 Comment
  • Feb
    19

    Obama commented on the home mortgage crisis at Dobson High School in Mesa, Ariz. Obama unveiled a strategy that aims to help millions of people avoid housing foreclosure.

    ob1

    PHOENIX — President Barack Obama promised help for up to nine million struggling homeowners to refinance or modify their mortgages, in the most significant move to aid homeowners since the housing crisis began.

    The plan, which could cost as much as $275 billion, will enable as many as five million homeowners who have little equity in their homes — or even owe slightly more than their homes are worth — to refinance loans through government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The administration set aside $200 billion in new backing for the pair, which will play a central role in the rescue.

    In addition, the government plans to spend $75 billion to encourage lenders to modify loan terms for people at risk of foreclosure or already in foreclosure proceedings. Lenders and the government would jointly lower monthly payments to 31% of homeowners’ income. To encourage servicers, the plan includes incentives such as $1,000-a-year “pay for success” fees if a borrower stays current on the loan.

    The plan drew praise for its use of incentives. But critics said it didn’t do enough to address the difficulty of altering loans packaged into securities. It also will be harder for people to refinance their mortgages if they owe much more than the house is worth or the mortgages aren’t owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. That would leave out many borrowers in hard-hit states such as Florida, California and Arizona.

    The plan relies heavily on pushing lenders to rework troubled loans. Mr. Obama said he would back legislation giving bankruptcy judges power to modify terms of loans — a looming penalty designed to further encourage lenders to prevent foreclosures.

    Some details remain unclear, such as precisely who will qualify for some of these programs — a question being hotly debated within the administration, according to an administration official. More specific guidelines will be issued March 4.

    The plan is also notable for what it doesn’t do, such as finding a way to spur demand. One problem dragging down the market is an oversupply of homes. Some economists were hopeful the Obama plan would subsidize an interest-rate reduction for borrowers. Instead, it appears designed to aid homeowners who might lose their homes.

    Mr. Obama said the plan won’t help everyone, including investors and those already deep in trouble. He nodded to a potential backlash from diligent homeowners who have been making their payments, suggesting they’d benefit from stable neighborhoods with fewer vacant houses.

    “If we act boldly and swiftly to arrest this downward spiral, then every American will benefit,” Mr. Obama said in a speech in Mesa, Ariz., outside Phoenix.

    No Comments
  • Feb
    18

    This is a commentary from Evan Newmark of the Wall Street Journal.  I realize that obama is trying to fix this mess that bush left us, but evan makes a lot of sense as far as this housing boondoggle goes.  Here are his thoughts on this mess, which I’m inclined to agree with. Please comment below and tell us your thoughts.


    Is there anything more heartless than foreclosing on a home and throwing a family out on the street?

    How about taxing the family next door into penury to pay for the reckless borrowing of its neighbors?

    newmarke_col_blogicon08Welcome to the Obama Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan — a complicated wealth redistribution scheme dressed up as a cure for the nation’s housing woes. It is almost certainly bound to fail. Now, there is no doubting that Obama’s heart is in the right place. With foreclosures at record highs, the American white picket fence dream is crumbling. And the impulse of any caring President must be to do something, almost anything to keep the dream alive. But the experience of politicians tinkering with the U.S. housing market is not a happy one. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, anyone? Real estate is simply too complex to be manipulated by anything but the “invisible hand” of the market.

    Disagree?
    Just read the four page White House Executive Summary with its laundry lists of programs, federal and state bureaucracies, conditions and caveats. It’s confusing stuff even for the average MBA. How will it be digested by the average low-income subprime borrower?

    Here’s the loan modification process:
    “For a sample household with payments adding up to 43 percent of his monthly income, the lender would first be responsible for bringing down interest rates so that the borrower’s monthly mortgage payment is no more than 38% of his or her income. Next the initiative would match further reductions in interest payments dollar-for-dollar with the lender to bring that ratio down to 31 percent…”

    Again, that’s the Executive Summary.
    Can you imagine the chaos of a loan modification meeting between a subprime borrower and a bank officer? Multiply that a few million times — and that’s the $75 billion “homeowner stability initiative.” That’s if Obama is lucky enough to find the 3 to 4 million “responsible homeowners” he thinks would qualify or want to qualify for the government moolah.

    But he’s almost certainly overestimating the number of “responsible homeowners” out there. Those 3 to 4 million “responsible homeowners” are actually “credit challenged” borrowers. They put down very little money to purchase homes at very inflated prices. Not only do they hold no equity in their homes today. Even with a modified loan, there is only a remote prospect of building equity in the future.

    For most, economic self-interest says to walk away from the house rather than carry a modified mortgage that will suck up 31% of monthly income. Truth is, many of the “credit challenged” borrowers won’t even get to running the numbers. They simply will have no interest in sitting down with a bank officer and going through pay stubs and tax returns. Income verification? Are you kidding? That’s why many took the subprime mortgage in the first place.

    That millions of homeowners that were and are “irresponsible” is a harsh truth that Obama can’t really talk about. In his America, the Obama housing plan is one neighbor helping another who is simply down on his luck. If only his America were real. Then maybe his program would actually work.

    No Comments